£100 for THAT? The charge feels like a punishment
The instinct is to argue the charge is an outrageous penalty for a trivial slip. Careful: that exact argument lost in the Supreme Court. Here is what still works instead — and when the amount itself IS challengeable.
Phrases to look for on your letter: “parking charge notice” · “£60” · “£70” · “£100”
Why this is an appealable position
ParkingEye v Beavis (2015) upheld an £85 charge as enforceable, so "it's a disproportionate penalty" ALONE now fails. But amount-based arguments survive at the edges: charges above the industry cap (£100 under the current codes), charges inflated with unexplained "debt recovery" add-ons at appeal stage, and cases where the operator cannot show landowner authority to charge at all. Pair the amount point with a facts-based ground — signage, grace, payment — and it strengthens the whole appeal rather than carrying it.
Your position is strongest when
- The charge exceeds £100 or gained add-on fees before any court
- The operator won't evidence landowner authority
- Combined with any facts-based ground on this site
Evidence to gather now
- The notice showing the amount and any added fees
- Everything supporting your parallel factual ground
Your first move
Never lead with unfairness. Lead with your strongest factual ground, then note any over-cap amount or unexplained fees, and require proof of landowner authority.
Build my appeal letter — £9.99Answer 8 questions about what happened and get a ready-to-send appeal letter in minutes.
Common questions
So the charge amount can never be challenged?
It can — when it breaches the industry cap or sprouts add-ons, or when the operator lacks authority to charge at all. It just cannot be the whole argument anymore.
Who issued your ticket?
Private operators and councils run entirely different appeal routes. Find your operator to see whether your independent appeal goes to POPLA or the IAS — or read the council PCN route if your letter says “Penalty Charge Notice”.