Appeals Desk

POPLA vs the IAS: what actually happens when a parking appeal is decided

Both services are free, both are independent, both cover the same twelve months. Only one of them tells you how often it finds for the motorist. POPLA allowed 21.5% of the appeals it decided in 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025. The IAS does not publish the figure at all — and the last time it did, it was 6%.

Counted from each service's own annual report · checked 20/08/2026

21.5%
POPLA — allowed at adjudication
45.8%
POPLA — charge cancelled overall
not published
IAS — allowed at adjudication
6%
IAS — last published, 2021/22

POPLA, 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025

These are counts, not estimates. Every figure below is added up from the appendix table in POPLA's own annual report, operator by operator, and every percentage on this page is recalculated from those counts at the moment the page is served — there is no percentage stored anywhere in our code that could drift away from the numbers it came from.

OutcomeAppealsShare of concluded
Allowed — adjudicator found for the motorist14,57813.6%
Refused — adjudicator found for the operator53,10249.5%
Not contested by the operator — withdrawn before a decision34,50232.2%
Not contested by the appellant — motorist withdrew5,0204.7%
Total concluded107,202100%

Source: POPLA Annual Report 2025 — Appendix (Parking on Private Land Appeals, 30/04/2026) — checked 20/08/2026. Period: 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025.

POPLA's appendix breaks these totals down operator by operator — the full 2025 league table, every operator ranked by the share of decided appeals allowed →

The number that matters is the second one. A 21.5% win rate at adjudication sounds discouraging until you notice that 32.2% of all concluded appeals never reached an adjudicator because the operator withdrew. The single most likely outcome of taking a BPA operator to POPLA is that the operator stops defending it.

The IAS, 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025

The IAS publishes an annual report for the identical twelve months, prepared under Schedule 5 of the Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (Competent Authorities and Information) Regulations 2015. It contains a section headed “IAS Adjudication Outcomes”. That section discusses, in prose, how outcomes should be thought about. It gives no number for how many appeals were allowed, and none for how many were refused.

What the IAS report publishesFigure
Disputes received34,383
Disputes accepted (continued to case)25,476
Discontinued for operational reasons8,907 (25.9% of disputes received)
— of which conceded by the parking operator before adjudication7,888
— of which conceded by the motorist1,019
Appeals allowed at adjudicationnot published
Appeals refused at adjudicationnot published

Source: The Independent Appeals Service (IAS) Annual Report 2024–2025 (Independent Appeals Service, covering 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025) — checked 20/08/2026. We fetched and read this report rather than quoting anyone else's summary of it.

When did the IAS stop publishing it?

The last IAS report to disclose an allowed rate covered 2021/22, when 6% of appeals were allowed at adjudication — 94% decided in the operator's favour. Reports since then have not carried the split, a point the RAC made publicly when it called on the industry to publish full and transparent appeals data.

Source for the 2021/22 figure and the transparency call: RAC calls on private parking industry to publish full and transparent complaints and appeals data (RAC, 30/07/2025) — checked 20/08/2026. We fetched and read the 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025 report ourselves to confirm the split is still absent; that check is dated 20/08/2026.

Honest caveat, and it cuts against the headline. Because the IAS does not publish outcomes, nobody can currently say what the IAS allowed rate is — including us. The 6% is four years old and predates both the single Code of Practice and the Appeals Charter. One thing is identical whichever service hears you, and it is worth quoting at an operator that stalls: Code of Practice v1.1 §8.4.8: Parking operators must accept determinations made by the relevant Appeals Service. Anyone quoting it as today's IAS success rate, including sites that sell appeal letters, is quoting a stale number. What can be said today is narrower and firmer: one service publishes its outcomes and the other does not, so a driver facing an IPC operator is choosing under uncertainty that a driver facing a BPA operator is not.

The one comparison that survives both caveats

Both services publish how often the operator gives up before a decision. That is the one thing you can compare, and it has to be done carefully, because the two bodies count out of different totals:

Operator concessionsCountDenominatorShare
POPLA — appeals not contested by the operator34,502107,202 appeals concluded32.2%
IAS — conceded by the operator before adjudication7,88825,476 disputes accepted to case31%
IAS — the same count against the wider total7,88834,383 disputes received22.9%

Measured against live cases somebody actually had to defend, the two are close — 32.2% at POPLA and 31% at the IAS. Measured against everything that arrived, the IAS figure falls to 22.9%. We are showing both because the honest answer depends on a denominator neither body defines the same way, and quoting only the flattering one is how the numbers in this market usually get quoted.

Either way, the point stands: on the evidence both bodies actually publish, the strongest single argument for appealing is not the adjudicator at all. It is that on both routes charges taken to an independent service are abandoned by the company that issued them far more often than drivers expect: the IAS reports 7,888 of 25,476 accepted disputes conceded by the operator before adjudication.

How council PCNs compare

Council penalty charges go to a traffic adjudicator instead, and the London figures are published in full. In 2024-25, London's Environment and Traffic Adjudicators decided 21,246 parking appeals and allowed 10,496 — 49.4%. But 6,143 of those wins were cases the council chose not to contest. Strip those out and 20.5% were won against a council that turned up and argued.

RouteBodyPeriodAllowed where contested and decidedCharge cancelled including concessions
Private — BPA memberPOPLA1 October 2024 to 30 September 202521.5%45.8%
Private — IPC memberIAS1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025not publishednot published (operator concessions 7,888)
Council PCN, LondonETA2024-2520.5%49.4%
Council PCN, England outside London and WalesTPTNot currently published — the tribunal's own appeals-data page said, when we checked it, that its published data runs only to 2021/22

Sources: Environment and Traffic Adjudicators — parking appeal statistics 2024-25 (London Tribunals, covering 2024-25) — checked 20/08/2026 · Appeals Data and glossary (Traffic Penalty Tribunal, 16/04/2026) — checked 20/08/2026.

Set the two contested numbers next to each other and something quietly useful appears: 21.5% against a private operator at POPLA, 20.5% against a London council that defends its case. A contested appeal is a contested appeal. What differs between the routes is not how a fair-minded adjudicator decides — it is how much the issuer concedes before anyone has to.

What this means for your own ticket

Which body hears your appeal is not your choice: it is set by the trade association your operator belongs to. POPLA and the IAS side by side, including the 28-day and 28-day windows → · look your operator up among all 217 →

Should I appeal — and will I lose my discount?

Free. Your issuer and notice date in; the discount rule that applies to you, quoted from the code, and your deadlines out.

Common questions

What percentage of POPLA appeals are successful?

21.5% of the appeals POPLA decided in 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025 were allowed — 14,578 of 67,680. Counting the 34,502 charges the operator withdrew before a ruling, 45.8% of the 107,202 appeals POPLA concluded ended with the charge cancelled.

What percentage of IAS appeals are successful?

Nobody outside the IAS can say. Its 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025 annual report does not publish how many appeals were allowed or refused. The last report that did covered 2021/22 and put the allowed rate at 6%. Treat any current-sounding IAS success rate you see quoted as a four-year-old number.

Is POPLA fairer than the IAS?

We cannot evidence that, and we will not claim it. What the published data supports is narrower: POPLA discloses its outcomes and the IAS does not, and both disclose operator concession volumes that are broadly similar. A difference in transparency is not the same as a difference in fairness, and we would rather say so than sell you a comparison the data does not carry.

Are council parking appeals more successful than private ones?

On the headline number yes — 49.4% of London parking appeals were allowed in 2024-25 against 21.5% at POPLA. But 6,143 of the London wins were uncontested, and once those are removed the contested rate is 20.5%, which is close to POPLA's. The difference is mostly in how often the issuer folds, not in how adjudicators decide.

Does it cost anything to appeal to POPLA or the IAS?

No. Both independent services are free to the motorist, and both require you to have completed the operator's own appeal stage first.

Every figure on this page is counted from the annual report named beside it and recalculated from those counts when the page is served. Reports are published annually and figures change; the check date on this page is 20/08/2026. Nothing here is legal advice and no outcome is guaranteed. Free independent guidance is available from Citizens Advice.

Sources named above: Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (Competent Authorities and Information) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015/542)

Your words, in a box, read by a person. We ask for no name and no email.